Compare: Blocks Small Army #2310 Thunder vs. Action Town Construction Backhoe Loader
Cobi Blocks Small Army #2310 Thunder | Cobi Action Town Construction Backhoe Loader, 330 Piece Set |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Price: $17.51 | Price: $15.80 |
Description: I'm going to share with you this excellent Cobi building block set called. A summary of features are compatible with leading block brands! and quality european craftsmanship!. The Cobi block kit has a weight of 1 lbs. To start with, understand that you can buy a terrific present for kids without having to spend an arm and a leg Reviews are the perfect to acquire info regarding both the price and quality linked to items. If you're lucky, you'll discover the experiences a person's kid gained using the item. |
Description: I in fact liked that the product has the feature of cobi brick figures, plates and playsets are compatible with other brand name brick and block building figures and sets. Other highlights include things like 330 piece set. The Cobi building block set is 12"H x 12"L x 2"W and it weighs around 1 lbs. How to buy the Cobi Action Town Construction Backhoe Loader, 330 Piece Set . To buy the product now at the cheapest price, click on our partners via the link. |
Features:
|
Features:
|
Manufacturer: COBI Building Blocks | Manufacturer: COBI |
Part Number: COB2310 | Part Number: 1643 |
Model: COB2310 | Model: COB1643 |
MPN: COB2310 | MPN: 1643 |
EAN: 5902251023102 | EAN: 5902251016432 |
SKU: CO4001301A00004 | SKU: COB1643 |
Binding: Toy | Binding: Toy |
Min. Age: 36 months | Min. Age: 72 months |
Height: | Height: 12" |
Length: | Length: 12" |
Width: | Width: 2" |
Weight: 1 lbs. | Weight: 1 lbs. |
Package Height: 2.2" | Package Height: 2.28" |
Package Length: 9.37" | Package Length: 12.05" |
Package Width: 7.95" | Package Width: 11.89" |
Package Weight: 0.57 lbs. | Package Weight: 1.19 lbs. |
[View Product] | [View Product] |
Comparison results for Cobi Blocks Small Army #2310 Thunder and Cobi Action Town Construction Backhoe Loader, 330 Piece Set. Which is better?